고비어의 수렴 논증에서 반대사유의 지위에 관하여

초록

This paper relates to conductive arguments, which are founded by Carl Wellman and developed by Trudy Govier. Govier analyzes and defines characteristics of the conductive arguments, and presents procedures of evaluating them. As the conductive arguments usually have counter-considerations as well as the supporting considerations, according to Govier, the suitability of reasoning critically depends upon balancing of pros and cons. It is argued that the conductive arguments take counter-considerations only as the subject of a cons-invalidation claiming premise, and the evaluation thereof should be adjusted accordingly.

키워드