직업교육훈련 분야 공적개발원조 사업의 평가항목 타당성 분석

초록

The purpose of this study was to suggest evaluation items for evaluating Korea-supported vocational education and training projects, which are valid and fit for the five DAC evaluation criteria of relevance, effectiveness, efficiency, impact and sustainability. For this, the study specified the very broad contents of the general and ambiguous five evaluation criteria of OECD/DAC into detailed evaluation items suitable for Korea's ODA projects in vocational education and training for developing countries, and analyzed the validity of the evaluation items. The study examined evaluation items utilized commonly in domestic and foreign evaluation reports, and selected 62 evaluation items. Then, as an indicator of validity, the importance of each item was measured and analyzed through a Delphi survey of a group of experts in the field of vocational education and training. The evaluation items emphasized most by Korean experts in vocational education and training and ODA evaluation were: 1) relevance – consistency with the recipient country’s priority of educational development; 2) efficiency - efficiency in communication between the recipient country and the Korean executive organization; 3) effectiveness - achievement of project goals; 4) Impact - effects on the transfer of technologies to the recipient country and the country’s development of technical human resources; and 5) sustainability - whether the recipient country has capabilities to manage, maintain and repair facilities and equipment.

키워드