포스트휴먼과 지능 담론(3) - 인간과 인공지능의 비교를 중심으로

초록

The purpose of this paper is to critically organize the issues that can be found in the comparative discourse between human intelligence and artificial intelligence, and to examine whether these issues are properly set through related studies. In relation to the human brain, we examined whether the concepts of 'knowledge' and 'consciousness' are appropriate for comparison. The knowledge accumulated by humans does not only refer to data learned about the outside world. It is worth noting that knowledge is the basis for judging actions. The historical and social values ​​of actions based on knowledge, not knowledge itself, define intellectuals. Next, with respect to the mechanism of action of the human brain, being 'conscious' does not simply mean being awake. We next examined whether artificial intelligence and human intelligence could be compared. The 'separation of consciousness and intelligence' clearly shows that the development directions of artificial intelligence and human intelligence are different. Artificial intelligence aims for accuracy, and human intelligence for creativity. Therefore, it can be seen that their comparison is unreasonable in that human intelligence uses depth and artificial intelligence speed as its evaluation criteria. Lastly, although artificial intelligence does not reveal concrete reality, it exists in our society as an existence that has already surpassed humans in discourse. Not all promises about the future of science and technology are being kept. The appearance of artificial intelligence predicted by science is only a promise for the future. However, contradictory comparisons between humans and artificial intelligence continue, and humans are discovering themselves anew through the comparison.

키워드