문화예술지원 거버넌스 체계에 관한 비교 연구: 영국, 프랑스, 한국 사례를 중심으로

초록

The purpose of this study is to provide policy implications for Korean network governance in culture and art support policy by comparing the UK, French, and Korean cases. Applying three structural modes of policy implementation, this study analyzes interdependent relationships between network managers as well as between network mangers and other policy actors in the support system. The results can be summarized by country. In the UK governance system, two network managers are identified and their relationship is reciprocal. Financial support flows from the Department of Culture, Media and Sport to the Arts Council England, and then to cultural and art institutions, which indicates sequential interdependence among these policy actors. The role of the central government in France is important since network relations are relatively centralized. There are three network managers playing coordinating roles and the overall support system is structured as a combination of pooled, sequential, and reciprocal interdependence. Finally, like the UK, in the Korea, two network managers are identified, but they do not have a formal collaborative relationship for coordinating overall culture and art support governance. Thus, the relationship between the two network managers can be described as pooled interdependence. Another thing to note in Korea is that the managerial power of the central ministry is relatively high, similar to the case in France. The overall governance system can be described as pooled and sequential interdependence.

키워드