A multicenter study of entecavir vs. tenofovir on prognosis of treatment-naïve chronic hepatitis B in South Korea

  • Kim, Seung Up; 
  • Seo, Yeon Seok; 
  • Lee, Han Ah; 
  • Kim, Mi Na; 
  • Lee, Yu Rim; 
  • 외 12명
Citations

WEB OF SCIENCE

146
Citations

SCOPUS

153

초록

Background & Aims It is currently unclear which antiviral agent, entecavir (ETV) or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), is superior for improving prognosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). Here, we assessed the ability of these 2 antivirals to prevent liver-disease progression in treatment-naïve patients with CHB. Methods From 2012 to 2014, treatment-naïve patients with CHB who received ETV or TDF as a first-line antiviral agent were recruited from 4 academic teaching hospitals. Patients with decompensated cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) at enrollment were excluded. Cumulative probabilities of HCC and death or orthotopic liver transplant (OLT) were assessed. Results In total, 2,897 patients (1,484 and 1,413 in the ETV and TDF groups, respectively) were recruited. The annual HCC incidence was not statistically different between the ETV and TDF groups (1.92 vs. 1.69 per 100 person-years [PY], respectively; adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.975 [p = 0.852] by multivariate analysis). Propensity score (PS)-matched and inverse probability of treatment weighting (ITPW) analyses yielded similar patterns of results (HR 1.021 [p = 0.884] and 0.998 [p = 0.988], respectively). The annual incidence of death or OLT was not statistically different between the ETV and TDF groups (0.52 vs. 0.53 per 100 PY, respectively; adjusted HR 1.202 [p = 0.451]). PS-matched and ITPW analyses yielded similar patterns of results (HR 1.248 [p = 0.385] and 1.239 [p = 0.360], respectively). These findings were consistently reproduced in patients with compensated cirrhosis (all p >0.05). Conclusions The overall prognosis in terms of HCC and death or OLT was not statistically different between the ETV and TDF groups. Further studies are needed to validate our results. Lay summary It is currently unclear which antiviral agent, entecavir or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, is superior for improving prognosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection. In this analysis we found that there was no difference in terms of overall prognosis, including risk of hepatocellular carcinoma, death, or the need for a liver transplant, in patients receiving either antiviral.

키워드

Entecavir; Tenofovir; Hepatocellular carcinoma; Prognosis; Comparison; HBV; HCC; CLINICAL-PRACTICE GUIDELINES; HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA; NUCLEOS(T)IDE ANALOGS; RISK; MANAGEMENT; ASSOCIATION; PREDICTORS; CIRRHOSIS; FIBROSIS; EFFICACY
제목
A multicenter study of entecavir vs. tenofovir on prognosis of treatment-naïve chronic hepatitis B in South Korea
저자
Kim, Seung Up; Seo, Yeon Seok; Lee, Han Ah; Kim, Mi Na; Lee, Yu Rim; Lee, Hye Won; Park, Jun Yong; Kim, Do Young; Ahn, Sang Hoon; Han, Kwang-Hyub; Hwang, Seong Gyu; Rim, Kyu Sung; Um, Soon Ho; Tak, Won Young; Kweon, Young Oh; Kim, Beom Kyung; Park, Soo Young
DOI
10.1016/j.jhep.2019.03.028
발행일
2019-09
유형
Article
저널명
Journal of Hepatology
권
71
호
3
페이지
456 ~ 464