제주 해군기지 건설을 둘러싼 지역주민과 공무원의 갈등 프레임 비교분석

초록

Parties in a conflict use different frames to understand and interpret the conflict dynamics. This study emphasized that the systematic analysis of the disputants' cognitive frames is a key element for the successful management of intractable policy conflicts. This study attempted to compare frames of local residents in Gangjeong with those of government officials about conflicts over construction of the Jeju naval base. In order to analyze the frames, a total of eight in-depth interviews were conducted and the interview transcripts were analyzed through the technique of semantic network analysis. The results showed that two groups had very different conflict frames. For local residents, the identity frame and the characterization frame played as the dominant frames. In contrast, the characterization frame and the conflict management frame were the most influential frames for government officials. Further, they interpreted local residents' opposition to the naval base from the perspective of a gain-loss frame. Based on these results, this study made important suggestions that would contribute to the successful management of policy conflicts.

키워드