Assessment of the Surveillance Interval at 1 Year after Curative Treatment in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Risk Stratification

Citations

WEB OF SCIENCE

14
Citations

SCOPUS

14

초록

Background/Aims: Guidelines recommend surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence at 3-month intervals during the first year after curative treatment and 6-month intervals thereafter in all patients. This strategy does not reflect individual risk of recurrence. We aimed to stratify risk of recurrence to optimize surveillance intervals 1 year after treatment. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 1,316 HCC patients treated with resection/radiofrequency ablation at Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage 0/A. In patients without 1-year recurrence under 3-monthly surveillance, a new model for recurrence was developed using backward elimination methods: training (n=582)/validation cohorts (n=291). Overall survival (OS) according to risk stratified by the new model was compared according to surveillance intervals: 3-monthly versus 6-monthly (n=401) after lead time bias correction and propensity-score matching analyses. Results: Among patients without 1-year recurrence, age and international normalized ratio values were significant factors for recurrence (hazard ratio [HR], 1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00 to 1.03; p=0.009 and HR, 5.63; 95% Cl, 2.24 to 14.18; p<0.001; respectively). High-risk patients stratified by the new model showed significantly higher recurrence rates than low-risk patients in the validation cohort (HR, 1.73; 95% Cl, 1.18 to 2.53; p=0.005). After propensity-score matching between the 3-monthly and 6-monthly surveillance groups, OS in high-risk patients under 3-monthly surveillance was significantly higher than that under 6-monthly surveillance (p=0.04); however, OS in low-risk patients under 3-monthly surveillance was not significantly different from that under 6-monthly surveillance (p=0.17). Conclusions: In high-risk patients, 3-monthly surveillance can prolong survival compared to 6-monthly surveillance. However, in low-risk patients, 3-monthly surveillance might not be beneficial for survival compared to 6-monthly surveillance.

키워드

Surveillance interval; Carcinoma; hepatocellular; Curative treatment; Risk stratification; POSTOPERATIVE RECURRENCE; INTRAHEPATIC RECURRENCE; RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION; INCREASED SURVIVAL; HEPATIC RESECTION; CLINICAL-PRACTICE; GUIDELINES; MANAGEMENT
제목
Assessment of the Surveillance Interval at 1 Year after Curative Treatment in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Risk Stratification
저자
Lee, Minjong; Chang, Young; Oh, Sohee; Cho, Young Youn; Jung, Dhong-Eun; Kim, Hong Hyun; Nam, Joon Yeul; Cho, Hyeki; Cho, Eun Ju; Lee, Jeong-Hoon; Yu, Su Jong; Yi, Nam-Joon; Lee, Kwang-Woong; Lee, Dong Ho; Lee, Jeong Min; Yoon, Jung-Hwan; Suh, Kyung-Suk; Kim, Yoon Jun
DOI
10.5009/gnl17365
발행일
2018-09
유형
Article
저널명
Gut and Liver
권
12
호
5
페이지
571 ~ 582

파일 다운로드

Thumbnail