A comparative study among normal saline, water soluble gel and 2% lidocaine gel as a SLIPA lubricant

Citations

SCOPUS

3

초록

Background: This study was designed to find appropriate lubricant for streamed lined liner of pharyngeal airway™ (SLIPA™). We evaluated the incidence of sore throat, nausea, vomiting, hoarseness, paresthesia and blood stain after using saline, water soluble gel and 2% lidocaine gel as a SLIPA™ lublicant. Methods: One hundred twenty three patients scheduled for minor surgery to whom the SLIPA™ was considered suitable were randomly allocated to one of three groups which receive normal saline, water soluble gel or 2% lidocaine gel as a SLIPA™ lublicant. Patients were interviewed at recovery room, post operation 6-12 hour, post operation 18-24 hour about sore throat and other complications. Results: There were no statistical difference in sore throat and blood stain among three groups. Also there were no statistical differences in hoarseness, nausea, vomiting. The incidence of paresthesia in 2% lidocaine gel group was significantly higher than those of the other two groups immediately after operation, but it was resolved after leaving the recovery room. Conclusions: Our results suggest that normal saline, water soluble gel and 2% lidocaine gel are all available as a SLIPA™ lubricant. Size of SLIPA™, insertion technique and difficulty of insertion should be further investigated as the main causes of a sore throat and other complications which can occur after the insertion of SLIPA™. © the Korean Society of Anesthesiologists, 2014.

키워드

Lubricant; SLIPA; Sore throat
제목
A comparative study among normal saline, water soluble gel and 2% lidocaine gel as a SLIPA lubricant
저자
Park, P.-G.; Choi, G.J.; Kim, W.J.; Yang, S.-Y.; Shin, H.-Y.; Kang, H.; Baek, C.W.; Jung, Y.H.; Kim, J.-Y.; Kang, M.-S.
DOI
10.4097/kjae.2014.66.2.105
발행일
2014-02
유형
Article
저널명
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology
권
66
호
2
페이지
105 ~ 111

파일 다운로드

Thumbnail