Comparison of Learning Outcomes Between Active Participants and Observer Roles in Simulation-Based Learning

Citations

WEB OF SCIENCE

8
Citations

SCOPUS

9

초록

Background: The educational impact of observation compared to active participation in simulation-based learning remains uncertain. This study aimed to compare knowledge, clinical reasoning skills, and learning flow between active participants and observers in a nursing simulation experience. Methods: This study was a parallel randomized trial of two groups. Nursing students were randomly assigned to active participant (n = 37) and observer (n = 32) groups. Knowledge, clinical reasoning skills, and learning flow were measured before and after the simulation. Results: Both groups showed improved knowledge, clinical reasoning skills, and learning flow after simulation-based learning, with no pre-test−post-test differences in the three outcomes between the groups. Conclusions: Observers showed similar improvements in learning outcomes compared to active participants in a simulated learning experience. Further studies are needed to identify the effects of reflective observation on performance acquisition and retention. © 2023

키워드

clinical reasoning skillsknowledgelearning flownursing studentsobservationpatient simulationFIDELITY PATIENT SIMULATIONNURSING-STUDENTSEXPERIENCESASSIGNMENTSKILLS
제목
Comparison of Learning Outcomes Between Active Participants and Observer Roles in Simulation-Based Learning
저자
Ham, Youn SukPark, Young MiRoh, Young Sook
DOI
10.1016/j.ecns.2023.101497
발행일
2024-02
유형
Article
저널명
Clinical Simulation in Nursing
87