Cost-Effectiveness of Intravascular Imaging-Guided Complex PCI: Prespecified Analysis of RENOVATE-COMPLEX-PCI Trial

Citations

WEB OF SCIENCE

24
Citations

SCOPUS

31

초록

BACKGROUND: Although clinical benefits of intravascular imaging-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with complex coronary artery lesions have been observed in previous trials, the cost-effectiveness of this strategy is uncertain. METHODS: RENOVATE-COMPLEX-PCI (Randomized Controlled Trial of Intravascular Imaging Guidance vs Angiography-Guidance on Clinical Outcomes After Complex Percutaneous Coronary Intervention) was conducted in Korea between May 2018 and May 2021. This prespecified cost-effectiveness substudy was conducted using Markov model that simulated 3 states: (1) post-PCI, (2) spontaneous myocardial infarction, and (3) death. A simulated cohort was derived from the intention-to-treat population, and input parameters were extracted from either the trial data or previous publications. Cost-effectiveness was evaluated using time horizon of 3 years (within trial) and lifetime. The primary outcome was incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), an indicator of incremental cost on additional quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained, in intravascular imaging-guided PCI compared with angiography-guided PCI. The current analysis was performed using the Korean health care sector perspective with reporting the results in US dollar (1200 Korean Won, =1 dollar, 35 000 per QALY gained. RESULTS: A total of 1639 patients were included in the trial. During 3-year follow-up, medical costs (7236; incremental cost, 57 040 per QALY gained within trial data. Conversely, lifetime simulation showed total cumulative medical cost was reversed between the 2 groups (49 519; incremental cost, -$9063) with consistently higher QALY (8.24 versus 7.89; incremental QALY, 0.910) in intravascular imaging-guided PCI than angiography-guided PCI, resulting in a dominant incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. Consistently, 70% of probabilistic iterations showed cost-effectiveness of intravascular imaging-guided PCI in probabilistic sensitivity analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The current cost-effectiveness analysis suggests that imaging-guided PCI is more cost-effective than angiography-guided PCI by reducing medical cost and increasing quality-of-life in complex coronary artery lesions in long-term follow-up. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03381872. © 2024 Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. All rights reserved.

키워드

coronary artery disease; health care sector; myocardial infarction; percutaneous coronary intervention; quality of life; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; ELUTING STENT IMPLANTATION; DUAL ANTIPLATELET THERAPY; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; ANGIOGRAPHIC GUIDANCE; MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; ULTRASOUND GUIDANCE; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; AMERICAN-COLLEGE; ARTERY-DISEASE
제목
Cost-Effectiveness of Intravascular Imaging-Guided Complex PCI: Prespecified Analysis of RENOVATE-COMPLEX-PCI Trial
저자
Hong, David; Lee, Jin; Lee, Hankil; Cho, Juhee; Guallar, Eliseo; Choi, Ki Hong; Lee, Seung Hun; Shin, Doosup; Lee, Jong-Young; Lee, Seung-Jae; Lee, Sang Yeub; Kim, Sang Min; Yun, Kyeong Ho; Cho, Jae Young; Kim, Chan Joon; Ahn, Hyo-Suk; Nam, Chang-Wook; Yoon, Hyuck-Jun; Park, Yong Hwan; Lee, Wang Soo; Park, Taek Kyu; Yang, Jeong Hoon; Choi, Seung-Hyuk; Gwon, Hyeon-Cheol; Song, Young Bin; Hahn, Joo-Yong; Kang, Danbee; Lee, Joo Myung
DOI
10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.123.010230
발행일
2024-03
유형
Article
저널명
Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcome
권
17
호
3
페이지
223 ~ 233