생태적 전환을 위한 ‘참여소득’의 가능성: 기본소득, 보편적 기본서비스, 일자리보장제와의 비교

초록

The purpose of this study is to examine the possibility of Participation Income in terms of promoting socially useful activities. For this purpose, basic income, universal basic services, job guarantee policy, and participation income are reviewed from the viewpoint of policy mechanism to facilitate socially and ecologically useful activities. It is participation income that conceptually proposes the production of socially useful activities, but the other three alternatives also had the mechanism of the production of socially useful activities. Sufficient level of basic income can contribute to the production of socially useful activities, directly or indirectly, through human autonomy and useful activities, however, with a premise that people voluntarily participate in such activities. Job guarantee policy contribute to social useful activities by promoting people to work in pre-designed work that can be ecological. However, compared with these alternatives, participation income has a high political realization potential because it contains the principle of reciprocity. Second, it aims for the future of work by emphasizing socially useful activities beyond productive labor. Third, it is evaluated that it has potential and implications as a policy proposal that can actively produce eco-friendly activities which promotes the transition to a sustainable ecological society as well as create essential social services that contribute to the public interest.

키워드