Surviving a Crisis: How Crisis Type and Psychological Distance Can Inform Corporate Crisis Responses

  • Lee, S.Y.
  • Sung, Y.H.
  • Choi, D.
  • Kim, D.H.
Citations

SCOPUS

40

초록

This research examines how one’s construal level of a crisis differs by crisis type, and how the interplay of crisis type (self-threatening vs. society-threatening) and apology appeal type (emotional vs. informational) impacts the effectiveness of apology messages in a corporate crisis context. Findings indicate that one’s mental construal toward a crisis varies by crisis type, with a self-threatening crisis leading to a lower level of construal than a society-threatening one. Findings further suggest that in a society-threatening crisis condition, an informational apology was more effective than an emotional one. However, in a self-threatening crisis condition, there was no significant difference between two different message types. These findings offer valuable guidelines for developing effective crisis response strategy. © 2019, Springer Nature B.V.

키워드

Apology message appealConstrual level theoryCrisis management communicationCrisis type
제목
Surviving a Crisis: How Crisis Type and Psychological Distance Can Inform Corporate Crisis Responses
저자
Lee, S.Y.Sung, Y.H.Choi, D.Kim, D.H.
DOI
10.1007/s10551-019-04233-5
발행일
2021
유형
Article
저널명
Journal of Business Ethics
168
4
페이지
795 ~ 811