현장연구시의 연구자의 역할-인류학적 현지조사, 행동실험적 연구, 및 임상적 연구의 비교-

Changing roles in the field:A Comparison of Ethnography, Action Research, and Clinical Research

초록

This paper compares three qualitative methodologies ethnography, action research, and clinical research in terms of the roles of researcher in the field. Although these qualitative methodologies share common characteristics in that they emphasize holistic approach and rely on ‘fieldwork’ for gathering data, they differ on several aspects. Using the three fieldwork roles as an analytical framework, I analyze my own fieldwork experience at an R&D center of a multinational company operating in Japan.

키워드

연구방법론; 정석적 방법론; 인류학적 현지조사; 행동실험적 연구; 임상적 연구; qualitative methodologies; the roles of researcher in the field; qualitative methodologies; the roles of researcher in the field
제목
현장연구시의 연구자의 역할-인류학적 현지조사, 행동실험적 연구, 및 임상적 연구의 비교-
제목 (타언어)
Changing roles in the field:A Comparison of Ethnography, Action Research, and Clinical Research
저자
김효선
발행일
2005-01
저널명
Korea Business Review
권
8
호
2
페이지
145 ~ 158