뇌심혈관질환에 대한 업무상 질병 판정에 관한 의사결정연구: 판단분석 기법의 활용

초록

This study is about decision making on work-related Cerebrovascular and Cardiac disease and how to make a decision on approval of occupational disease among decision elements. To investigate the above aim, Judgment Analysis is performed. The results of this study are summarized as follows. First, when experts make a judgment as to whether they give claimants approval of work-related Cerebrovascular and Cardiac disease benefits or not, overwork and abnormal(unexpected) situation among decision elements are considered as top priorities. Second, the characteristic of experts shows they make a decision with limited information. Individual experts have a tendency to judge with limited decision elements such as overwork, unexpected situation. Third, this study showed us judgment policy which can compare respondents’ judgment behavior through Judgment Analysis. For example, expert A makes use of all of six decision elements, whereas, expert B make a decision with only one decision element(one Cue). Though experts make a decision regarding worker’s compensation with limited decision elements(overwork, abnormal situation), experts’ judgment policies are high consistency in that mean R² indicates high(0.66).

키워드